Library Blind Date

'High Expectations'

'High Expectations'

In the local library, which I visit once a week, they have  a Mystery Book on the Issues counter.  It is hidden inside a plain white A4 envelope.  On four consecutive Saturdays, I have been able to resist.

This week I cracked.  I had to have it.

They wouldn’t let me have the Mystery Book on the counter.  Underneath the desk, there is a pile of plain white envelopes.  I get the one on the top, and leave the library without opening it.

I’m expecting a middle-brow novel.  It would be great to have a handbook on gyro-copter mechanics, or a guide to the sacrificial customs of Ancient Mesopatamia.  However, I can’t quite believe a library will let its mystery books be as mysterious as that.  I’m betting on a middle-brow novel or perhaps a safe biography, someone like Mary Queen of Scots or Lenny Henry.

They call it the Lucky Dip.  I open my white A4 envelope.  It is a novel called The Clematis Tree, by Ann Widdecombe.  I guess I’m just lucky.

No, really.  I would never have chosen this book for myself.  And I mean never in the sense of never ever ever never ever.  That’s the whole point.  The Lucky Dip worked – I have a blind book date that I’d never have chosen with my eyes open.

I think it’s safe to say that as a politician Ann Widdecombe made no great effort to be liked, and effortlessly succeeded .  She carries the same gung-ho attitude into her author’s biog: ’[She] writes her novels on long train journeys and in Singapore, when she visits her Chinese nanny.’

This is the secret I’ve been searching for, and which so far I’ve been unable to share with the students at the Academy.  No Chinese nanny, no published novel.

I’m looking forward to giving it a go, though I’ve now reconsidered the selection policy of the librarians as they scout round the shelves with their fresh white envelopes.  The Clematis Tree has not been stamped (it was inside an envelope), nor has the bar code been scanned.  Maybe they only pick books that no-one would want to steal.

Share

My Ear-Goggles are Leaking

'no, really dude, where are my ear-goggles?'

'no, seriously dude, where are my ear-goggles?'

On a bootleg Jimi Hendrix album called Mr Pitiful (German sleeve, Swiss pressing) Jimi has a shambolic stab at a studio recording of Wooly Bully.  He is long gone dogbone stoned, and has lost his earphones.  He finds this hilarious, but nobody else knows what he’s looking for.  You know, he giggles, the ear-things, man, the ear-goggles. 

I always loved that.  And since i-pods came out even more so.  Tuck in the plastic ear-goggles and see the world differently, in your own chosen way.   My music, my timing, my world.  I-pod, me-pod.

The i-pod is a wonderful invention, but I can’t help feeling there are some unanswered design questions.  I don’t use my ipod on the bus, not since I was made jumpy by the full tincan trash of overheard Gangsta Crap Classics on the 994 bus to Perry Barr.   I started to wonder whether i-pod earphones, at high impact, would do more damage to my knuckles or to a person’s inner ear.

I thought probably the latter, and he wouldn’t even hear me coming.

That’s why I stopped listening to my ipod in public.  There are nutters about. Many of them get enraged by the tin-tinny sound, and it’s not your music, your timing, your world.  It’s theirs as well, it’s mine, so be careful out there.  The world is bigger than your i-pod can make you think.

If i-pods are such a great invention (and they are) and Apple is such a great company (and it is) why can’t they make earphones which don’t spill so much sound in the wrong direction?  I’d like to take that question seriously.  I’d like to go and talk to someone at Apple about it.  Who made the decision that the earphones could be rubbish?  Who’s working at sorting it out?  If I can get someone to pay me to ask the questions I might well go ahead.

In the meantime, the tunnel ear-vision of the i-pod reminds me of a song by those old phonies The Levellers.  I always thought the lyrics went:  ‘There’s only one wavelength, and that’s your own (that’s your own, that’s your own).’  I could never understand that: the Levellers were supposed to be neo-anarchists but they were writing lyrics for Herman Goering.

I just looked it up .  The song is called One Way, and the lyrics go ‘There’s Only One Way of Life, and that’s your own (that’s your own, that’s your own)’.  Even worse!  Plugging in the i-pod can be like this, tone-deaf and goggle-blind to the desolation of the ‘only me ‘ idea.  My music, my world. 

Still, those me-pod moments appeal to the apocalyptic teenage egoism that hangs around in all of us.  The same self-absorption that can make the teenage years so lonely.  Truly, no-one else exists.  The full surround-sound blindness.

 

 

Share

Man, I Feel Like a Woman

Man, I Feel Like a Woman
Arena, August 2008

Wales1063

From personal experience, I will now pass on some essential advice about what to do when your motorcycling, canoeing, hiking and generally manly man friend tells you he’s about to have a sex-change.

Don’t laugh.

That’s it. Failing this, you must not under any circumstances go on to say what you’re actually thinking, which in my case was something like this:

You ride a motorcycle called The Flying Pig and are an expert on remedies for shaving rash. You have a dismantled crank-case on the table in your front room. You drink lunchtime pints of Smiles Old Tosser and you work in the engine-room of a 7000 ton ferry. You are not a woman.

‘From now on,’ my friend Drew said, ‘I want you to think of me as she.’

I laughed.

She was wearing her usual outfit of black combat trousers and a ragged fleece, but also pearl earrings and a brushed-down fringe. She’d waxed her forearms. I had an awful, immediate sense of no going back, followed just as quickly by an attack of paranoia. If this was funny (and it was second nature with male friends to search for the joke, the protection) it was a boyish prank being played at my expense.

Men pretending to be women are funny. They’re having a laugh, an old favourite from the dressing-up chest at the back of the British music-hall. But how funny is it to be a woman trapped in a man’s body? Is it alright to have a sense of humour about this? What exactly is the joke when Bugs Bunny dresses as a lady?

Easy. He’s a rabbit.

Sitting in her flat, that first day when some unknown force had doodled pearl-stud earrings onto the person I thought I knew, I found everything she told me questionable.

When did this start? How? Why? The predictable, loaded enquiry about sex – are you now or have you ever been attracted to men? (To me – that’s who I had in mind.) It was hard to avoid a nasty tone of inquisition, because the information she offered seemed unreliable. We knew each other pretty well, well enough to share on a regular basis the one-and-a-half man space in your average two-man tent, and want to do it again. That well, and not at all. If she could hide the truth that she was secretly a woman, then why believe anything else she said?

I went to the library and read some books. They didn’t always help. The medical information had me squeezing my legs together while the personal accounts were mostly witness autobiographies by Americans. America loves the transgender story (‘As Seen On Oprah!’) because it has obvious themes of transformation and re-invention, liberating a you-go-girl inner being just bursting to get out there and shake it.

The story is given a recognisable shape, a Hollywood heart-warmer with the bonus feature of sprightly details involving the wonder of vaginal dilators. The protagonist starts out as redneck Bubba and ends up a torch singer in a velvet lounge-bar. If she’s lucky. If not, she’s the strap-line on an afternoon victim show – My Wife Is A Man!

I wasn’t convinced that this model offered a true reflection of the here and now for this friend of mine in England, how it had started, how it was going to end up.

My friend switched her combat trousers for a denim skirt, with a Gerber multi-tool on a red lanyard clipped to the belt loop. It was a day or two later, and I was back at her place making a second attempt at an acceptable first reaction.

Some of her explanations sounded learnt, memorised from the FAQ page of a minority-interest website. She admitted that to get female hormones on prescription, she’d had to jump through hoops for a psychiatrist at the Gender Identity Clinic at Charing Cross Hospital in London. She even talked about ‘putting a name to my gender issues’, a sure sign she’d been exposed to language a psychiatrist might like to hear. It didn’t sound like something she’d normally say. But then the denim skirt didn’t look like something she’d normally wear.

It had started, so she said, one New Year’s Eve when she was given shore-leave from the her ship, which was berthed in Weymouth for the holidays. Her girlfriend travelled down from Bristol, and before hitting the town’s party-pubs the two of them decided to swap clothes.

‘Low-necked three-quarter-length black velvet dress, mid-length sleeves,’ she said, with instantly perfect recall.

‘Make-up?’

‘Oh yes.’

‘Shoes?’

‘Alas, no. My Doc Martens. Size ten women’s pumps are hard to find in Weymouth on New Year’s Eve.’

‘I bet they are.’

‘And in fact at any other time.’

Footwear apart it was a more than fair swap against a standard issue boiler-suit, but had the change really started so late? What the hell did I know?

Only what I’d read in books, so the second time round at her flat I resolved to keep my mouth shut and avoid the more bone-headed questions.

‘Why skirts and dresses?’ I couldn’t help it. ‘Why can’t transsexuals wear trousers? Women do.’

That was the fault of the system, apparently. The internet support-groups let it be known that anyone turning up at Charing Cross in trousers could be marked down for showing insufficient commitment.

‘To what? Marie-Claire and side-salads?’

‘To the operation.’

Christ, I thought, you only put the earrings in a week ago.

‘And by the way,’ she corrected me, ‘transsexual is an adjective.’

At the same time, my friend seemed strangely unchanged. There were the clothes and the jewellery and the make-up, but these were on the surface. Underneath, and not that deeply either, the old Drew was visible, and however many questions I asked, I soon realised they were all foothills to the one central mountain of a question:

Was this believable?

I wanted to be loyal, to be understanding and accepting, but the main obstacle was the possibility that appearances aside this new incarnation was simply not true. It was a charade, a deception, a jape. It was Bugs Bunny, and no-one wants to be fuddled and duped by the cheeky wabbit.

Did I believe in my friend as a woman? I didn’t want to hurt her feelings, but this was the same woman who knew the flight patterns of RAF Tornados, who thought that fewer than three pints at lunchtime didn’t count as lunch, and who cleaned out carburettors with a toothbrush. She just didn’t seem like the kind of person with whom nature had made a mistake.

When we’d first met years before I’d liked her immediately. Here was a real man with a motorbike and a real man’s job, in the engine room of the Channel Island ferry. That was her appearance and I was happy to accept it. She was a manual worker, a member of the working class! I was slightly in awe. She also liked her drink, as I did, as well as books and camping. She was so straightforward.

I can see now that this must have been a bad time, and the drink was a factor. I wonder what else I should have seen, but taking her as I found her, I wasn’t looking for anything else. I may even have believed that with friends it was bad form to look any further, with a view to making a judgement, and maybe that’s how I missed her churning desire to appear to the world as she really was.

It felt like a failure in our friendship, and I think there was a sense of disappointment on both sides. She let me down because she never told me. I let her down because I never guessed. I’m a writer. I’m supposed to be sensitive to such things.

I go over it again and again. Were there any clues, any feminine traits that could have alerted me? I remembered a blameless life of cheery self-reliance and outdoor pursuits, but suddenly she was taking to the streets of Bristol in a dress, and had no idea what she was doing – she went out looking like a transsexual. I remember one particular outfit: black stack-heeled zip-up boots, a sleeveless brown corduroy dress, ash-blonde wig. The full Oxfam rig, and although I had no intrinsic objection to any of these bits and pieces, I didn’t want to see any of them on Drew.

She took jolting doses of female hormone and changed her name by statutory declaration from Drew to Drusilla, while still working on a P & O ferry, the ear defenders infecting her newly pierced ears. I made a big effort to say ‘she’, not always successfully. I had, and occasionally still do have, severe outbreaks of pronoun anxiety, because ‘he’ and ‘she’ now carried more weight than pronouns felt designed to bear. They were the keys to an elaborate and disturbing deception, elaborate because it involved so many of us pretending that Dru was she, and disturbing because the lie was possibly the truth.

That’s what I ultimately wanted to find out – if ‘Drusilla’ was true. Luckily for me, when I suggested the idea of a book, she seemed keen on sharing the story of her life, ‘except if I die in surgery, obviously.’

‘Right. Don’t want to ruin the heart-warming ending.’

I wanted to be fair. That’s what friends are for, and the stakes were very high. If ‘Drusilla’ was not true, then instead of a good person to go camping with my former friend was a real life horror story, a fizzing combination of modern afflictions. She was probably psychotic, possibly sexually deviant, certainly attention-seeking, and conceivably a secret special agent of the patriarchy. No wonder candidates for surgery have to see so many psychiatrists.

But that comes later in the story. For now, I’m supposed to be offering advice to Arena readers on what to do if you ever find yourself in a similar situation. So far you already know not to laugh and not to say what you’re thinking. You should also avoid the kind questions that come from nowhere to fill embarrassing silences, like ‘is it catching?’ and ‘I suppose camping’s out of the question, then?’

Dru gave me a withering look. Of course camping wasn’t out of the question, and nor was going to the pub. She was a woman, not a blushing wallflower.

Becoming Drusilla is the book that came out of a two-week walking and camping trip we made to Wales a few months after Dru’s operation. It’s also the biographical story of how Drew became Drusilla. I had to confront prejudices I didn’t know I had, often in public places, while Dru tried to convince me she was the same person and a woman. Try that today on one of your closest friends, if you think you know each other well enough.

Share

The Unavoidable Shortness of the Short Story

Bigging up the Short Story
November 2008
www.theshortstory.org

shortbread

Talking up the short story is an admirable enterprise, especially in Britain. The short story has been having a hard time, with outlets for publication shrinking and collections barely able to reach an agent’s desk. The idea of short stories making money has become as quaint a notion as travelling by commercial balloon. It is therefore quite right, and compatible with the national instinct, to support the underdog. We take the side of the short story and try to big it up.

One way of doing this, which short story enthusiasts will recognise, is to suggest that a story is as challenging to write as a novel. Each line must be impeccably precise, no word can be wasted. This is true. The bad news for writers is that every line should be equally meticulous in a novel. There’s no letting up on quality just because more pages demand to be filled. The writer has to write well for longer, at the same time administering the vast bureaucracy of a novel: the structure, the people, the places, the meals, the transport – all the required paperwork.

Or perhaps, as some people argue, the short story has a particular contemporary relevance because these days time itself is shorter, or shorter than it used to be. This may be so, but another contemporary phenomenon is greed, and there’s a sense of frustration that comes bundled with every short story ever written, and especially so in the finest examples. I can recognise why the writer stopped writing, but as a greedy reader if I like what I read I want more and more of the same.

How about another 200 pages or so? At which point, of course, the story may start to resemble a novel. The main limitation of the short story is its shortness, which is one reason the novel has developed into the dominant form it now is.

The shortness of a short story (there it is again – impossible to escape this defining feature) is also a major attraction to novelists. The same, only easier. The writing process is instantly recognisable – do one thing you can’t do and which is difficult, and when that’s done do another – but this series of difficulties comes to an end much sooner. Writers have a vested interested in talking up the form.

There are other pleasures. It can be interesting to sacrifice some of the what-happens-nextness (the engine of a novel) for more of the what’s-happening-nowness (the focus of a story). Beyond that, the challenge for a writer is not technical but conceptual: identifying and sorting ideas into the right shapes and sizes. I get different types of ideas (thankfully) and because different forms offer different opportunities I’ve written a sports book, a travel book, and a biography. This is how I know that writing novels throws up the most problems quickest, and therefore offers the best apprenticeship for all other forms of creative writing, including short stories.

I came to short stories late, and it may be that my ideas are getting smaller. I’m running out, or running down. I’m also using up what’s left over. Stories are useful for that, too, with the added advantage of avoiding The Best Book In The World syndrome, which can make writing books so daunting. There’s always the temptation to delay work on a book because it has to be The Best Book In The World. Now. Today.

Stories are more relaxed, more comfortably likened to a game of Patience: set up the cards and arrange the conflict (black on red, red on black) – sometimes it comes out, and sometimes it doesn’t. When it does, as with any other type of writing, it’s because the words fit the sentences fit the paragraphs fit the structure fit the form fit the ideas fit the writer. And when that happens, when everything comes together, small is just as likely to be beautiful.

Share

The Wars of the Roses Explained

York, who took the place of Gloucester, was in alliance with Cambridge, though the main Yorkist network was in the South and West.  The Lancastrians rose in Kent.  Norfolk was for York, but not Warwick, while the king was stricken with measles at Durham. The Earl of March drove the King to Wiltshire in July and August.  York was summoned to Leicester but retired in spurs to Sandal, in Yorkshire, where he was joined by Warwick and Salisbury.  Buckingham and Dorset were wounded and carried home in a cart.  York became the stronghold of the Lancastrians while Exeter, remembering St Albans, beheaded Salisbury, the son of Buckingham.  Somerset went north and the ensuing battle took place in a blinding snowstorm. 

Or a fog.  At Barnet, Warwick turned the king’s left flank, but Warwick too was turned while Oxford from Lancaster overlapped the Yorkist left before getting lost.  He eventually arrived in Somerset’s rear, whose flank had already been routed meaning a pedestrian Warwick battered to death.

On balance, historians believe, the winner was England.

Share